Remember me on this computer. Thischaracterdoes not shy away from voicing his opinions and likes to maintain decorum during thediscussions. At thebeginning, he is the only member of the jury who votes not guilty’ and with stands all thepressure from the other jury members. I know various things like group behavior, how group operates, how different people have different roles in group at different times. Hence, these twelve people discover their own set of beliefs and thought processes as they try to unravel the same for the accused. Post on Jan 59 views.
Objective of Watching Movie The main objective of watching Ek Ruka Hua Faisla is to identify and analyze the implications and implementation of different concepts, aspects and theories of managerial communication. There was a committee of 12 people assigned to decide whether boy was culprit or not. The protagonist approaches the subject of capital punishment with caution and wants the other member of jury to convince him, that convicted person is guilty. Hence, these twelve people discover their own set of beliefs and thought processes as they try to unravel the same for the accused. He also demonstrates a passive constructive personality. Each is trying to convince the rest about their viewpoint, even as slowly people start moving their vote from guilty to not guilty.
Analysis of the Movie: Post on Jan 59 views.
Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link. Since he comes from a similarbackground, he is in a better position to understand the accused situations and empathize with him.
He is the person who belongs the same slum as the accused.
Overall it was a good learning experience that helped me better understands human behavior, up to fase level people can go and how one can tackle even deviant behavior in a group. Manjil Prasad Shrestha Roll No: In this process, People either convinced themselves or convince others.
Ek ruka hua faisla case study
This helps to confirm your knowledge aboutthe subject plot and also to know more things which are missing or we dont know. We also learn that every decision should be based on reasonable evidence and it can be dangerousto rush to conclusions.
Case study on Power of Communication by movie – Ek ruka hua caze.
Take away from the movieThere is overall change on the total group after having the long the discussion on the subject. Power of Communication effect: By saying that it’s not easy for him sentence a boy todeath without even discussing the facts he opens the other jury member’s minds to the possibilitythat the accused may not be guilty.
The questions get thecommunication going and encourages the other party to talk, to share information with you andaccording you can negotiate your view points on it. He is very patient and calm throughout the processand bases his decisions on pure logic. Then a few are there who are of the type “I am always right”.
In similar circumstances the role of power and politicscomes into play when people with a dominant personality try to influence others and make themthink and do things according to them.
Case study on Power of Communication by movie – Ek ruka hua faisla – [PDF Document]
First of all we learn that whenever a number of people from different culture, background, mindset come together then conflict are sure to take place. Another impressive aspect of the movie is its attention to detail, as each and every small and sometimes unimaginable nuance of the case is analyzed and debated upon, and yet the script and dialogues keep you engrossed all the time.
Juror 5 Subhash Udghate: Thepower of asking various questions and coming to down to common view made them think aboutvarious analytics.
Also whenever some decisions are taken as a team then the focus should be on taking theviewpoints of everybody and collectively coming to a decision rather than focusing on expressingonly individual viewpoints and influencing others as well.
Help Center Hya new research papers in: Casee are twelve male members of a jury who have gathered together in an enclosed room to deliberate on charges of murder against a young boy accused of killing his own father.
Ek ruka hua faisla case study
Conflicts arise due to fausla in the information, values, beliefs, interests, or desires and rivalries in which one person or group competes with each other From this movie, I could infer that time Bound and specific objectives play an important role in group dynamics. He is the voice of reason, and plays the most crucial role. Twelve Angry men an Analytical essay. By Jonathan Clough and Jacqueline Horan.
Case study on Power of Communication by movie – Ek ruka hua faisla
But there is only one jury member who is not completely convinced about the case and he starts the discussions, in which all the members have to participate to reach a common conclusion.
He acts as a co-ordinator throught the film. When the moviebegins it seems like the committee is already sure about the decision- guilty. The Power of Communication is the effect a person creates by asking the right questions andpracticing good listening skills to understand the subject well. He is the arrogant, criticizing and was the shouting member of thegroup. The last person who changed his opinion that the accused was not guilty was actually having a perceptual error of stereotyping.
He is the most actively destructive juror having his original opinions andprejudices which are biased in nature.
Remember me on this computer.