The project also acted on a recommendation to focus more effort on the re-assessment period: You do not have to accede to such requests and you may undermine your own academic judgement by doing so. Aspects of the implementation that relate to specific areas of the assessment and feedback life-cycle include: Even when the feedback is collected, many tutors suspect that some students focus more on the mark than on their carefully prepared feedback. Should my feedback focus on knowledge specific to the assignment, or generic transferable skills? They are normally academics or staff members at another UK university.
Shouldn’t I focus my attention on the poorer students? See also 6 below for information on support during reassessment. All undergraduate units are now included in this database and the records include information about the type and weighting of the assessment and the skills students are likely to demonstrate in completing the work. The university offers over 1, courses and qualifications, the majority of which have a strong professional bias. As a result of this work MMU has also decided to include data about unit reassessments in its performance monitoring and provision of support for individual units.
If they need specific help eg on spelling, grammar or structuring work then indicate where they should go for this. As a result of this work MMU has also decided to include data about unit reassessments in its performance monitoring and provision of support for individual units. The feedback should enable the students to learn from what they have done and from your judgement of it.
Subject External Examiners are encouraged to provide a summary of issues for the Programme team to address. If there is clearly a problem with spelling, grammar or structure then you need to point the student towards more systematic support. MMU encourages students to reflect on their own performance and make themselves a personal action plan for the future, as well as requiring tutors to reflect on the effectiveness of each part of the assessment cycle from setting to the return of work.
All undergraduate units are now included in this database and the records include information about the type and feebdack of the assessment and the skills students are likely feedhack demonstrate in completing the work. An estimate of the expected feedback date should then be published in the programme handbook along with the assignment submission deadline.
Assignments which are not in printed form, such as artefacts or portfolios will need to be returned to students at some point. We all do a lot of marking, frequently under great pressure, and you should be open to the possibility that you have missed something which would have altered your judgement, but do not mmmu a student bully you into changing your mind.
External Examiners @ Manchester Metropolitan University Students’ Union
External Examiners are not involved in the marking process and will not be asked to alter individual student marks. If you want students to learn from their examination experiences, then you should of course be providing feedback on their performance in those exams. If the student is not satisfied with this discussion, then he or she may need to be directed to the student complaints procedure. Home Articles External Examiners. Consulted about the design and content of assessments and involved in the approval of assessment elements.
The University has a clear courseworrk on marks moderation ; project dissertations should always be second marked, but apart from these, second marking is done on a sampling basis.
When would I give out a model answer or provide feevback feedback? All faculties are now required to put in place a clear plan for this period including elements such as a consistent approach to providing reassessment information and resources in the VLE, a rota of staff to cover student queries, telephoning all students who have been given a clursework opportunity and briefing student support staff about arrangements and staff availability.
A checklist might be good for giving instant feedback after a presentation, while a detailed written report might work better for an essay. The feedback should enable the students to learn from what coyrsework have done and from your judgement of it rather than simply be a critique of the document in front of you. The MMU Commitment to return feedback within four weeks was introduced towards the end of the first year of the project.
New procedures to support consistent approaches to marking, moderation and feedback were also introduced as part of the project.
If you have more than one assignment in a unit, then you could offer marks in the second assignment for showing evidence of having acted on feedback from the first assignment – see Try allocating marks for acting on previous feedback reedback the Try something section. Having said this, most tutors would want to discuss this situation informally with students.
Examples of different types of feedback might be: A good compromise here is to review examination performance with students at the beginning of the new academic year, in a related unit. MMU guidance on Returning marks and feedback.
University Teaching Academy
You could give out the feedback without the mark. If no authorised extensions have been given then this could possibly be done within a few days of submission, if you have had time to look at a sample of submitted assignments and prepare an overview. Your email address coursewofk not be published.
Commenting on a series of research studies on feedback, Chris Rust has observed that: Leave a Coursewor Cancel reply The following information is needed for us to identify you and display your comment. Returning marks and feedback: There is an example in this assignment brief. Make sure that all assessments are carried out in accordance with the University Assessment Regulations. What is an External Examiner? Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.